|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
09/11/2015 |
Actualizado : |
09/11/2015 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Actividades de Difusión |
Autor : |
JORNADA ANUAL ARROZ-SOJA-MAÍZ, 1986, CIAAB-EEE, TREINTA Y TRES, UY.; CHEBATAROFF, N.; BLANCO, P.H.; ÁVILA, S.; SALDAIN, N.E.; BLANCO, F.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; ACEVEDO, A. |
Afiliación : |
PEDRO HORACIO BLANCO BARRAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIFLOR STELLA ÁVILA SILVA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; NÉSTOR ELIO SALDAIN CROCCE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO GUILLERMO BLANCO BORDÓN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GONZALO ROBERTO ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN PEREYRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANTONIO MARIA ACEVEDO VEGA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Arroz-soja-maíz: Resultados de la experimentación regional en cultivos 1985-86. |
Fecha de publicación : |
1986 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): CIAAB; EEE, 1986. |
Páginas : |
100 p. |
Serie : |
(CIAAB Resultados Experimentales; 2). |
Idioma : |
Español |
Notas : |
Centro de Investigaciones Agrícolas "Alberto Boerger" (CIAAB), Estación Experimental del Este (EEE). |
Contenido : |
CLIMA
ARROZ
Mejoramiento: Objetivos del Programa Mejoramiento Genético. Épocas de siembra. Ensayos preliminares. Ensayos internacionales. Ensayos regionales. Respuesta de cultivares semienanos a nitrógeno en suelos pesados. Selección de poblaciones segregantes.
Manejo: Control de malezas. Ensayos regionales de fertilización.
fitopatología: Camas de infección. Fungicidas para enfermedades del tallo.
SOJA
Mejoramiento: Èpocas de siembra. Ensayos preliminares. Ensayos varietales regionales. Selección.
Manejo: Ensayos regionales de fertilización. Ensayos de fertilización.
Fitopatología: Curasemillas.
RIEGO Y DRENAJE. Arroz: Manejo del agua. Sistema arroz-soja. Maíz. Manejo. Evaluación de híbridos.
SERVICIO DE SEMILLAS: Arroz: Producción de semilla. Pruebas semicomerciales de materiales promisorios. Estudio de atípicos en Bluebelle. Soja: Producción de semilla. |
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; MAIZ; SOJA. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5130/1/Arroz-Soja-Maiz-1985-1986.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01769nam a2200265 a 4500 001 1053806 005 2015-11-09 008 1986 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aJORNADA ANUAL ARROZ-SOJA-MAÍZ, 1986, CIAAB-EEE, TREINTA Y TRES, UY. 245 $aArroz-soja-maíz$bResultados de la experimentación regional en cultivos 1985-86.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aTreinta y Tres (Uruguay): CIAAB; EEE$c1986 300 $a100 p. 490 $a(CIAAB Resultados Experimentales; 2). 500 $aCentro de Investigaciones Agrícolas "Alberto Boerger" (CIAAB), Estación Experimental del Este (EEE). 520 $aCLIMA ARROZ Mejoramiento: Objetivos del Programa Mejoramiento Genético. Épocas de siembra. Ensayos preliminares. Ensayos internacionales. Ensayos regionales. Respuesta de cultivares semienanos a nitrógeno en suelos pesados. Selección de poblaciones segregantes. Manejo: Control de malezas. Ensayos regionales de fertilización. fitopatología: Camas de infección. Fungicidas para enfermedades del tallo. SOJA Mejoramiento: Èpocas de siembra. Ensayos preliminares. Ensayos varietales regionales. Selección. Manejo: Ensayos regionales de fertilización. Ensayos de fertilización. Fitopatología: Curasemillas. RIEGO Y DRENAJE. Arroz: Manejo del agua. Sistema arroz-soja. Maíz. Manejo. Evaluación de híbridos. SERVICIO DE SEMILLAS: Arroz: Producción de semilla. Pruebas semicomerciales de materiales promisorios. Estudio de atípicos en Bluebelle. Soja: Producción de semilla. 650 $aARROZ 650 $aMAIZ 650 $aSOJA 700 1 $aCHEBATAROFF, N. 700 1 $aBLANCO, P.H. 700 1 $aÁVILA, S. 700 1 $aSALDAIN, N.E. 700 1 $aBLANCO, F. 700 1 $aZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G. 700 1 $aACEVEDO, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
07/02/2023 |
Actualizado : |
24/04/2023 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
DA CUNHA, L. L.; BREMM, C.; SAVIAN, J.V.; ZUBIETA, Á. S.; ROSSETTO, J.; CARVALHO, P. C. DE F. |
Afiliación : |
LAIS LEAL DA CUNHA, LAIS LEAL, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; CAROLINA BREMM, State Foundation of Agricultural Research, Rua Gonçalves Dias, 570, Bairro Menino Deus, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ÁNGEL SANCHEZ ZUBIETA, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; JUSIANE ROSSETTO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; PAULO CÉSAR DE FACCIO CARVALHO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
Título : |
Relevance of sward structure and forage nutrient contents in explaining methane emissions from grazing beef cattle and sheep. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Science of the Total Environment, 2023. Volume 869, Article number 161695. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161695 |
ISSN : |
0048-9697 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161695 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 18 March 2022; Received in revised form 30 December 2022; Accepted 15 January 2023; Available online 21 January 2023; To be published 15 April 2023. -- Corresponding author: da Cunha, L.L.; Grazing Ecology Research Group, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Bento Gonçalves Ave., 7712, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:laiscvet@gmail.com -- Editor: Kuishuang Feng -- |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Forage nutrient contents are an important factor explaining the dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and methane emissions (CH4) of ruminants fed indoors. However, for grazing animals, the forage nutrient contents might be limited in explaining such response variables. We aimed to verify the explanatory power of forage nutrient contents and sward structure on daily intake, performance, and CH4 emissions by sheep and beef cattle grazing different grassland types in southern Brazil. We analyzed data from five grazing trials using sheep and beef cattle grazing on Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), mixed Italian ryegrass and black oat (Lolium multiflorum + Avena strigosa), pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum), and multispecies native grassland. We used mixed models, including the forage nutrient contents [crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF)], sward structure (sward height and herbage mass) and their interactions, as fixed effects and trial, season, methodologies, animal species, grassland type, and paddock, as random effects. The model for DMI (kg DM/LW0.75) had an adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj) of 71.6 %, where 11.3, 23.1, and 37.2 % of the R2adj were explained by the forage nutrient contents, sward structure, and their interaction, respectively. The ADG (kg/LW0.75) model presented an R2adj of 74.2 %, with 12.5 % explained by forage nutrient contents, 29.3 % by sward structure, and 32.4 % by their interaction. The daily CH4 emission (g/LW0.75) model had a lower adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj = 47.6 %), with 16.8 % explained by forage nutrient contents and 30.8 % explained by sward structure, but no effect of the interaction. Our results show that in grazing ecosystems, the forage nutrient contents explain a small fraction, and the greater explanatory power for DMI, ADG, and CH4 emissions models is related to sward structure descriptors, such as sward height and herbage mass. Moreover, the interaction between these variables explains most of the variation. In conclusion, forage nutrient contents and sward structure have different influences on DMI, ADG, and CH4 emissions by grazing ruminants. Because of its relevance to daily CH4 emissions, offering an optimal sward structure to grazing animals is a major climate-smart strategy to improve animal production and mitigate CH4 emissions in pastoral ecosystems. © 2023 Elsevier B.V. MenosABSTRACT.- Forage nutrient contents are an important factor explaining the dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and methane emissions (CH4) of ruminants fed indoors. However, for grazing animals, the forage nutrient contents might be limited in explaining such response variables. We aimed to verify the explanatory power of forage nutrient contents and sward structure on daily intake, performance, and CH4 emissions by sheep and beef cattle grazing different grassland types in southern Brazil. We analyzed data from five grazing trials using sheep and beef cattle grazing on Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), mixed Italian ryegrass and black oat (Lolium multiflorum + Avena strigosa), pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum), and multispecies native grassland. We used mixed models, including the forage nutrient contents [crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF)], sward structure (sward height and herbage mass) and their interactions, as fixed effects and trial, season, methodologies, animal species, grassland type, and paddock, as random effects. The model for DMI (kg DM/LW0.75) had an adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj) of 71.6 %, where 11.3, 23.1, and 37.2 % of the R2adj were explained by the forage nutrient contents, sward structure, and their interaction, respectively. The ADG (kg/LW0.75) model presented an R2adj of 74.2 %, with 12.5 % explained by forage nutrient contents, 29.3 % by sward structure, and 32.4 % ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Forage chemical composition; Grasslands; Livestock; Pastoral ecosystems; Sward height. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
Marc : |
LEADER 03850naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1063954 005 2023-04-24 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0048-9697 024 7 $a10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161695$2DOI 100 1 $aDA CUNHA, L. L. 245 $aRelevance of sward structure and forage nutrient contents in explaining methane emissions from grazing beef cattle and sheep.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 500 $aArticle history: Received 18 March 2022; Received in revised form 30 December 2022; Accepted 15 January 2023; Available online 21 January 2023; To be published 15 April 2023. -- Corresponding author: da Cunha, L.L.; Grazing Ecology Research Group, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Bento Gonçalves Ave., 7712, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:laiscvet@gmail.com -- Editor: Kuishuang Feng -- 520 $aABSTRACT.- Forage nutrient contents are an important factor explaining the dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and methane emissions (CH4) of ruminants fed indoors. However, for grazing animals, the forage nutrient contents might be limited in explaining such response variables. We aimed to verify the explanatory power of forage nutrient contents and sward structure on daily intake, performance, and CH4 emissions by sheep and beef cattle grazing different grassland types in southern Brazil. We analyzed data from five grazing trials using sheep and beef cattle grazing on Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), mixed Italian ryegrass and black oat (Lolium multiflorum + Avena strigosa), pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum), and multispecies native grassland. We used mixed models, including the forage nutrient contents [crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF)], sward structure (sward height and herbage mass) and their interactions, as fixed effects and trial, season, methodologies, animal species, grassland type, and paddock, as random effects. The model for DMI (kg DM/LW0.75) had an adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj) of 71.6 %, where 11.3, 23.1, and 37.2 % of the R2adj were explained by the forage nutrient contents, sward structure, and their interaction, respectively. The ADG (kg/LW0.75) model presented an R2adj of 74.2 %, with 12.5 % explained by forage nutrient contents, 29.3 % by sward structure, and 32.4 % by their interaction. The daily CH4 emission (g/LW0.75) model had a lower adjusted coefficient of determination (R2adj = 47.6 %), with 16.8 % explained by forage nutrient contents and 30.8 % explained by sward structure, but no effect of the interaction. Our results show that in grazing ecosystems, the forage nutrient contents explain a small fraction, and the greater explanatory power for DMI, ADG, and CH4 emissions models is related to sward structure descriptors, such as sward height and herbage mass. Moreover, the interaction between these variables explains most of the variation. In conclusion, forage nutrient contents and sward structure have different influences on DMI, ADG, and CH4 emissions by grazing ruminants. Because of its relevance to daily CH4 emissions, offering an optimal sward structure to grazing animals is a major climate-smart strategy to improve animal production and mitigate CH4 emissions in pastoral ecosystems. © 2023 Elsevier B.V. 653 $aForage chemical composition 653 $aGrasslands 653 $aLivestock 653 $aPastoral ecosystems 653 $aSward height 700 1 $aBREMM, C. 700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V. 700 1 $aZUBIETA, Á. S. 700 1 $aROSSETTO, J. 700 1 $aCARVALHO, P. C. DE F. 773 $tScience of the Total Environment, 2023. Volume 869, Article number 161695. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161695
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|